CaravanMover tests

Leipziger Volkszeitung(2022)

Not a real test. The company is discussed

Camping und Reise(2022)

Not a real test. The company is discussed

ACSI(2021)

Not a real test. The company is discussed

ACSI(2021)

This test discusses movers from Truma and Reich. The test was done on 2 different caravans, so you get very different results. The construction form and performance are different. Even without a mover, a Fendt caravan has less ground clearance than a Hobby. The mover itself doesn't take more height. The caravan it self is already lower.

Caravaninfo.de(2020)

Not a real test. The company is discussed

Autobild, caravan(2018)

Not a real test. The company is discussed

Camping, Cars & Caravans(2017)

Not a real test. In this German magazine Camping, Cars & Caravans is the German manufacturer Reich discussed.

GTUE(2016)

A theoretical test about battery-chargers.

Caravan, the history(2016)

The history of movers in the UK.

Caravaning(2014)

After Truma received a lot of attention from the German magazine Caravaning, it was now Reich's turn to introduce their new mover.
The test with an egg is no problem at all for these movers, a nod to Truma, who advertises stepless maneuvering with the new XT. Unfortunately, in this test, there is hardly any knowledge of batteries. According to the testers, you can drive for 3 hours with an Optima battery of 55 Ah, which of course is not possible.

Autobild (2013)

Theoratical test of battery-chargers from the German magazine Autobild.

KCK(2013)

These batteries are discharged with a constant load. This is not a problem for most batteries. A mover battery must be able to withstand fluctuations from 180A to 10A. Unfortunately, this has not been tested. We also think it is important that a manufacturer is reputable, the KCK also writes that in the article about safety. Unfortunately, this is not included in the test assessment.

Caravaning(2013)

In our opinion is this not a test, but a introduction of a new mover.

Camping, Cars & Caravans(2013)

The movers are supplied and assembled by the manufacturer. The manual for the XT states that you should try to mount it in front of the wheels. If that really doesn't work, mount it behind the wheels. The test focuses on driving straight ahead, but 2 different nose wheels are mounted, and the movers are not both mounted in front of the wheels. In addition, the tester unfortunately did not bother to check the weights specified by the manufacturer.

Caravaning(2012)

The weak point of this test is that the manufacturers have supplied the mover.

KCK(2012)

Surprising result of a movertest of the Dutch magazine KCK.

PurpleLine(2011)

A test done by a manufacturer. It will not surprise you that the own mover is the test winner. No more needs to be explained.

Freelife magazine(2011)

A extensive battery test of the Dutch magazine Freelife in association CMS.

KCK(2010)

A test of a caravan-battery of the Dutch magazine KCK.

Camping Fritid(2009)

A mover test of the magazine Fritid from Denmark.

Camping, Cars & Caravans(2009)

A Optima battery test of the German magazine Reisemobil.

KCK(2008)

A camper-trolley test in the Dutch magazine KCK. The outcome isn't verry surprising.

Tros Radar /KCK(2008)

A mover test where the manufacturer determined wich mover were tested.

Caravaning(2008)

A test of 3 movers in the German magazine Caravaning.

KCK(2006)

A mover test of the Dutch magazine KCK of the following movers: - PowrMover 1XL - Reich move Control II comfort - Simpark II slow start - Truma mover SE